📦

Astro

VS
📦

Remix

Astro vs Remix

Detailed comparison of Astro and Remix — two framework platforms. Compare features, performance, pricing, and find out which is right for your project in 2026.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

It depends — Astro and Remix serve different use cases well. Choose Astro for Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript. Choose Remix for Full-stack web applications that benefit from web-standard patterns.

Official docs: Astro Documentation · Remix Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureAstroRemix
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost Value
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Scalability
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ecosystem
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Astro

Pros

  • Ships zero JS to the client by default (Islands Architecture)
  • Use React, Vue, Svelte, or any framework in the same project
  • Content collections with type-safe Markdown/MDX
  • Purpose-built for content sites — blogs, docs, marketing pages

Cons

  • Not ideal for highly interactive apps (designed for content sites)
  • Smaller ecosystem than Next.js — fewer integrations available
  • SSR support is newer and less battle-tested
  • Island architecture requires thinking differently about interactivity

Remix

Pros

  • Built on web standards — forms, headers, and HTTP conventions
  • Nested routing with parallel data loading (no waterfalls)
  • Excellent error handling with error boundaries at every route
  • Works on any JavaScript runtime (Node.js, Deno, Cloudflare Workers)

Cons

  • Smaller community and ecosystem than Next.js
  • No built-in static site generation (SSR-focused)
  • Fewer deployment guides and templates available
  • Some features overlap/conflict with React Server Components

Platform Details

DetailAstroRemix
Language / Stack
JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic)JavaScript/TypeScript (React)
Type
frameworkframework
Pricing
Free (open-source)Free (open-source)
Open Source
YesYes
Best For
Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScriptFull-stack web applications that benefit from web-standard patterns
Export Method
N/A (destination framework)N/A (destination framework)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Astro if…

  • You need content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal javascript
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want a low learning curve for non-technical team members
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Choose Remix if…

  • You need full-stack web applications that benefit from web-standard patterns
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript/TypeScript (React)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Astro and Remix depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

Both platforms sit in the same category — framework — so the deciding factors are ecosystem size, editorial workflow, and specific feature gaps. Astro uses JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic), while Remix runs on JavaScript/TypeScript (React). If your developers already know one of those stacks, lean toward that platform to reduce ramp-up time.

From a cost perspective, both platforms are open-source, so the real cost difference is hosting and operational overhead. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP supports migration between 60+ platforms, so you're never locked in regardless of which you pick today.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Astro better than Remix?
They're closely matched (25/30 vs 25/30). Astro is best for Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript, while Remix excels for Full-stack web applications that benefit from web-standard patterns. Your choice should depend on your team's skills and project requirements.
Can I migrate from Astro to Remix?
Yes. Export your Astro content via N/A (destination framework), then convert it to Markdown or import into a headless CMS. LeaveWP can help automate this process while preserving your SEO metadata and URL structure.
What are the main differences between Astro and Remix?
Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default, while Remix is full-stack react framework built on web standards. Key differences: ease of use (Astro: 4/5, Remix: 3/5), pricing (Free (open-source) vs Free (open-source)), and scalability (Astro: 4/5, Remix: 5/5).
How much does Astro cost compared to Remix?
Astro: Free (open-source). Remix: Free (open-source). Both are open-source, so the main cost difference is hosting and infrastructure.
Which is easier to learn, Astro or Remix?
Astro is easier to pick up (4/5 vs 3/5). Ships zero JS to the client by default (Islands Architecture). Remix has a steeper learning curve, especially for teams new to JavaScript/TypeScript (React).
Which performs better, Astro or Remix?
Both score equally on performance (5/5). The real difference depends on your setup: Astro uses JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic), Remix uses JavaScript/TypeScript (React). Proper caching and CDN configuration matters more than the platform itself at this tier.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Astro or Remix

Astro vs Remix Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Astro, Remix, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration