📦

Hugo

VS
📦

11ty

Hugo vs 11ty

Compare Hugo and 11ty for building static websites. Find the best SSG for your project.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

Hugo for speed, 11ty for flexibility. Choose Hugo for large documentation sites, blogs with thousands of posts, or when build speed is critical. Choose 11ty for JavaScript-heavy sites, flexible templating needs, or when already in the Node.js ecosystem.

Official docs: Hugo Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureHugo11ty
Build Speed
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
JS Integration
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Built-in Features
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Documentation
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Hugo

Pros

  • Blazing fast builds
  • Single binary install
  • Built-in features
  • Great documentation
  • Large content sites

Cons

  • Go templates learning curve
  • Less JavaScript integration
  • Opinionated structure
  • Plugin system limited

11ty

Pros

  • Multiple template languages
  • JavaScript ecosystem
  • Flexible data cascade
  • Simple to start
  • No build tool needed

Cons

  • Slower than Hugo
  • Less batteries-included
  • Plugin discovery harder
  • Configuration heavy for complex sites

Platform Details

DetailHugo11ty
Language / Stack
Go (Go templates)JavaScript (multiple template languages)
Type
ssgssg
Pricing
Free (open-source)Free (open-source)
Open Source
YesYes
Best For
Documentation sites and blogs where build speed and simplicity matter mostPerformance-focused sites that need minimal client-side JavaScript
Export Method
N/A (destination framework)N/A (destination framework)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Hugo if…

  • You need documentation sites and blogs where build speed and simplicity matter most
  • Your team is comfortable with Go (Go templates)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Choose 11ty if…

  • You need performance-focused sites that need minimal client-side javascript
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript (multiple template languages)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want a low learning curve for non-technical team members
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Hugo and 11ty depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

Both platforms sit in the same category — ssg — so the deciding factors are ecosystem size, editorial workflow, and specific feature gaps. Hugo uses Go (Go templates), while 11ty runs on JavaScript (multiple template languages). If your developers already know one of those stacks, lean toward that platform to reduce ramp-up time.

From a cost perspective, both platforms are open-source, so the real cost difference is hosting and operational overhead. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP supports migration between 60+ platforms, so you're never locked in regardless of which you pick today.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which builds faster?
Hugo is the fastest SSG. It can build 10,000 pages in seconds. 11ty is fast but not Hugo-fast.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Hugo or 11ty

Hugo vs 11ty Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Hugo, 11ty, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration