Joomla
Astro
Joomla vs Astro: which is right for your project? Joomla is php cms balancing power and usability. Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. We compare features, performance, and pricing.
Start MigrationAstro wins overall, but Joomla is better for community portals and membership sites needing built-in user management. Choose Joomla for Community portals and membership sites needing built-in user management. Choose Astro for Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript.
Official docs: Joomla Documentation · Astro Documentation
| Feature | Joomla | Astro |
|---|---|---|
Ease of Use | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Performance | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Flexibility | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Cost Value | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Ecosystem | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Detail | Joomla | Astro |
|---|---|---|
Language / Stack | PHP | JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic) |
Type | traditional cms | framework |
Pricing | Free (self-hosted) | Free (open-source) |
Open Source | Yes | Yes |
Best For | Community portals and membership sites needing built-in user management | Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript |
Export Method | Database export or J2XML extension | N/A (destination framework) |
The right choice between Joomla and Astro depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.
These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Joomla is a traditional cms built with PHP, while Astro is a framework built with JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. If your team includes non-developers who need to publish content frequently, Joomla's familiar editing interface may save you onboarding time.
From a cost perspective, both platforms are open-source, so the real cost difference is hosting and operational overhead. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.
Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP supports migration between 60+ platforms, so you're never locked in regardless of which you pick today.
Explore more comparisons featuring Joomla or Astro
Compare WordPress and Astro for blogging. Find out which platform gives you better performance and SEO.
Compare Astro and Gatsby for building static websites. See which SSG is better for your project.
Detailed comparison of WordPress and Joomla — two traditional cms platforms. Compare features, performance, pricing, and find out which is right for your project in 2026.
Detailed comparison of Drupal and Joomla — two traditional cms platforms. Compare features, performance, pricing, and find out which is right for your project in 2026.
Drupal vs Astro: which is right for your project? Drupal is enterprise php cms for complex content architectures. Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. We compare features, performance, and pricing.
Joomla vs Ghost: which is right for your project? Joomla is php cms balancing power and usability. Ghost is modern publishing platform built for professional content creators. We compare features, performance, and pricing.
In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration
Static site generators have evolved dramatically. Here's how they compare to WordPress in 2026 and why many sites are making the switch.
16 min readcomparisonBoth Gatsby and Next.js can power your WordPress migration. But they take fundamentally different approaches. Here's how to choose the right one for your project.
12 min readcomparisonCompare Astro and Next.js for your next project. Performance, features, and use cases explained to help you decide.
11 min readMove your content between Joomla, Astro, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.
Start Free Migration