📦

Joomla

VS

Next.js

Joomla vs Next.js

Joomla vs Next.js: which is right for your project? Joomla is php cms balancing power and usability. Next.js is react framework for production with ssr, ssg, and api routes. We compare features, performance, and pricing.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

Next.js wins overall, but Joomla is better for community portals and membership sites needing built-in user management. Choose Joomla for Community portals and membership sites needing built-in user management. Choose Next.js for Production web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies.

Official docs: Joomla Documentation · Next.js Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureJoomlaNext.js
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost Value
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Scalability
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ecosystem
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Joomla

Pros

  • Built-in ACL system more powerful than WordPress out of the box
  • Native multilingual support without extensions
  • Flexible content categorization system
  • Good balance between ease of use and developer features

Cons

  • Smaller community means fewer extensions and themes
  • Admin interface feels dated compared to modern CMS options
  • Performance degrades with many extensions installed
  • Finding skilled Joomla developers is increasingly difficult

Next.js

Pros

  • Hybrid rendering — SSG, SSR, ISR, and client-side in one app
  • Most popular React framework with massive community
  • Built-in image optimization, API routes, and middleware
  • Optimized for Vercel but deploys anywhere (Node.js, Docker)

Cons

  • React learning curve for non-JavaScript developers
  • App Router introduced complexity with Server Components
  • Build output tightly coupled to Vercel's infrastructure features
  • Can be overkill for simple static content sites

Platform Details

DetailJoomlaNext.js
Language / Stack
PHPJavaScript/TypeScript (React)
Type
traditional cmsframework
Pricing
Free (self-hosted)Free (open-source)
Open Source
YesYes
Best For
Community portals and membership sites needing built-in user managementProduction web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies
Export Method
Database export or J2XML extensionN/A (destination framework)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Joomla if…

  • You need community portals and membership sites needing built-in user management
  • Your team is comfortable with PHP
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership

Choose Next.js if…

  • You need production web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript/TypeScript (React)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Joomla and Next.js depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Joomla is a traditional cms built with PHP, while Next.js is a framework built with JavaScript/TypeScript (React). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. If your team includes non-developers who need to publish content frequently, Joomla's familiar editing interface may save you onboarding time.

From a cost perspective, both platforms are open-source, so the real cost difference is hosting and operational overhead. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP offers a free JoomlaNext.js migration tool that preserves your URLs, metadata, and content structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Joomla better than Next.js?
Next.js scores higher overall (28/30 vs 18/30) thanks to better performance. However, Joomla remains the better choice for Community portals and membership sites needing built-in user management.
Can I migrate from Joomla to Next.js?
Yes. Export your Joomla content via Database export or J2XML extension, then convert it to Markdown or import into a headless CMS. LeaveWP can help automate this process while preserving your SEO metadata and URL structure.
What are the main differences between Joomla and Next.js?
Joomla is php cms balancing power and usability, while Next.js is react framework for production with ssr, ssg, and api routes. Key differences: performance (Joomla: 2/5, Next.js: 5/5), pricing (Free (self-hosted) vs Free (open-source)), and ecosystem size (Joomla: 3/5, Next.js: 5/5).
How much does Joomla cost compared to Next.js?
Joomla: Free (self-hosted). Next.js: Free (open-source). Both are open-source, so the main cost difference is hosting and infrastructure.
Which is easier to learn, Joomla or Next.js?
They're similarly approachable (both 3/5). Joomla uses PHP, while Next.js uses JavaScript/TypeScript (React). Your team's existing skills will determine which feels easier.
Which performs better, Joomla or Next.js?
Next.js has the performance edge (5/5 vs 2/5). As a framework, Next.js pre-renders pages for near-instant load times. Joomla Performance degrades with many extensions installed.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Joomla or Next.js

Joomla vs Next.js Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Joomla, Next.js, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration