Next.js

VS
📦

Contentful

Next.js vs Contentful

Next.js vs Contentful: which is right for your project? Next.js is react framework for production with ssr, ssg, and api routes. Contentful is api-first headless cms for omnichannel content. We compare features, performance, and pricing.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

Next.js wins overall, but Contentful is better for enterprises needing to deliver content across web, mobile, and iot channels. Choose Next.js for Production web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies. Choose Contentful for Enterprises needing to deliver content across web, mobile, and IoT channels.

Official docs: Next.js Documentation · Contentful Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureNext.jsContentful
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost Value
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Scalability
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ecosystem
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Next.js

Pros

  • Hybrid rendering — SSG, SSR, ISR, and client-side in one app
  • Most popular React framework with massive community
  • Built-in image optimization, API routes, and middleware
  • Optimized for Vercel but deploys anywhere (Node.js, Docker)

Cons

  • React learning curve for non-JavaScript developers
  • App Router introduced complexity with Server Components
  • Build output tightly coupled to Vercel's infrastructure features
  • Can be overkill for simple static content sites

Contentful

Pros

  • Powerful content modeling with structured content types
  • Global CDN-backed API delivers content at edge speed
  • Rich ecosystem of integrations (Algolia, Netlify, Vercel)
  • Excellent SDKs for every major language and framework

Cons

  • Expensive — free tier is very limited, paid starts at $300/month
  • Editing experience is functional but not beautiful
  • No built-in preview or visual editing (requires custom setup)
  • Vendor lock-in with proprietary content storage

Platform Details

DetailNext.jsContentful
Language / Stack
JavaScript/TypeScript (React)API-based (any frontend)
Type
frameworkheadless cms
Pricing
Free (open-source)Free / $300+/month
Open Source
YesNo
Best For
Production web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategiesEnterprises needing to deliver content across web, mobile, and IoT channels
Export Method
N/A (destination framework)Content Management API or CLI export

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Next.js if…

  • You need production web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript/TypeScript (React)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Choose Contentful if…

  • You need enterprises needing to deliver content across web, mobile, and iot channels
  • Your team is comfortable with API-based (any frontend)

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Next.js and Contentful depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Next.js is a framework built with JavaScript/TypeScript (React), while Contentful is a headless cms built with API-based (any frontend). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. Both platforms require some technical comfort — consider which tech stack aligns better with your team's existing skills.

From a cost perspective, Next.js is open-source (Free (open-source)), while Contentful (Free / $300+/month) carries ongoing license costs. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP supports migration between 60+ platforms, so you're never locked in regardless of which you pick today.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Next.js better than Contentful?
Next.js scores higher overall (28/30 vs 22/30) thanks to stronger ecosystem. However, Contentful is the better choice for Enterprises needing to deliver content across web, mobile, and IoT channels.
Can I migrate from Next.js to Contentful?
Yes. Export your Next.js content via N/A (destination framework), then import it into Contentful. LeaveWP can help automate this process while preserving your SEO metadata and URL structure.
What are the main differences between Next.js and Contentful?
Next.js is react framework for production with ssr, ssg, and api routes, while Contentful is api-first headless cms for omnichannel content. Key differences: performance (Next.js: 5/5, Contentful: 5/5), pricing (Free (open-source) vs Free / $300+/month), and ecosystem size (Next.js: 5/5, Contentful: 4/5).
How much does Next.js cost compared to Contentful?
Next.js: Free (open-source). Contentful: Free / $300+/month. Next.js is open-source and free to self-host, while Contentful is a paid platform.
Which is easier to learn, Next.js or Contentful?
They're similarly approachable (both 3/5). Next.js uses JavaScript/TypeScript (React), while Contentful uses API-based (any frontend). Your team's existing skills will determine which feels easier.
Which performs better, Next.js or Contentful?
Both score equally on performance (5/5). The real difference depends on your setup: Next.js uses JavaScript/TypeScript (React), Contentful uses API-based (any frontend). Proper caching and CDN configuration matters more than the platform itself at this tier.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Next.js or Contentful

Next.js vs Contentful Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Next.js, Contentful, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration