📦

Squarespace

VS
🚀

Astro

Squarespace vs Astro

Squarespace vs Astro: which is right for your project? Squarespace is all-in-one website builder with designer templates. Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. We compare features, performance, and pricing.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

Astro wins overall, but Squarespace is better for non-technical creators who want a polished site without touching code. Choose Squarespace for Non-technical creators who want a polished site without touching code. Choose Astro for Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript.

Official docs: Squarespace Developer Docs · Astro Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureSquarespaceAstro
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost Value
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Scalability
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ecosystem
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Squarespace

Pros

  • Beautiful, professionally designed templates out of the box
  • All-in-one: hosting, SSL, domain, and CDN included
  • Drag-and-drop editor requires zero coding knowledge
  • Built-in e-commerce, analytics, and email marketing

Cons

  • Walled garden — no code access or custom server logic
  • Cannot self-host or export to another platform easily
  • Limited to Squarespace's template system for design
  • Monthly costs add up ($192-588/year) for a content site

Astro

Pros

  • Ships zero JS to the client by default (Islands Architecture)
  • Use React, Vue, Svelte, or any framework in the same project
  • Content collections with type-safe Markdown/MDX
  • Purpose-built for content sites — blogs, docs, marketing pages

Cons

  • Not ideal for highly interactive apps (designed for content sites)
  • Smaller ecosystem than Next.js — fewer integrations available
  • SSR support is newer and less battle-tested
  • Island architecture requires thinking differently about interactivity

Platform Details

DetailSquarespaceAstro
Language / Stack
ProprietaryJavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic)
Type
website builderframework
Pricing
$16-49/monthFree (open-source)
Open Source
NoYes
Best For
Non-technical creators who want a polished site without touching codeContent-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript
Export Method
Built-in XML export (limited to blog posts and pages)N/A (destination framework)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Squarespace if…

  • You need non-technical creators who want a polished site without touching code
  • Your team is comfortable with Proprietary
  • You want a low learning curve for non-technical team members

Choose Astro if…

  • You need content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal javascript
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want a low learning curve for non-technical team members
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Squarespace and Astro depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Squarespace is a website builder built with Proprietary, while Astro is a framework built with JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. If your team includes non-developers who need to publish content frequently, Squarespace's familiar editing interface may save you onboarding time.

From a cost perspective, Astro is open-source (Free (open-source)), while Squarespace ($16-49/month) carries ongoing license costs. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP supports migration between 60+ platforms, so you're never locked in regardless of which you pick today.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Squarespace better than Astro?
Astro scores higher overall (25/30 vs 16/30) thanks to better performance. However, Squarespace remains the better choice for Non-technical creators who want a polished site without touching code.
Can I migrate from Squarespace to Astro?
Yes. Export your Squarespace content via Built-in XML export (limited to blog posts and pages), then convert it to Markdown or import into a headless CMS. LeaveWP can help automate this process while preserving your SEO metadata and URL structure.
What are the main differences between Squarespace and Astro?
Squarespace is all-in-one website builder with designer templates, while Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. Key differences: ease of use (Squarespace: 5/5, Astro: 4/5), pricing ($16-49/month vs Free (open-source)), and ecosystem size (Squarespace: 2/5, Astro: 3/5).
How much does Squarespace cost compared to Astro?
Squarespace: $16-49/month. Astro: Free (open-source). Astro is open-source and free to self-host, while Squarespace is a paid platform.
Which is easier to learn, Squarespace or Astro?
Squarespace is easier to pick up (5/5 vs 4/5). Beautiful, professionally designed templates out of the box. Astro has a steeper learning curve, especially for teams new to JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic).
Which performs better, Squarespace or Astro?
Astro has the performance edge (5/5 vs 3/5). As a framework, Astro pre-renders pages for near-instant load times. Squarespace may require additional optimization for high-traffic sites.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Squarespace or Astro

Squarespace vs Astro Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Squarespace, Astro, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration