📦

Webflow

VS
🚀

Astro

Webflow vs Astro

Webflow vs Astro: which is right for your project? Webflow is visual web development platform with clean code output. Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. We compare features, performance, and pricing.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

Astro wins overall, but Webflow is better for designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code. Choose Webflow for Designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code. Choose Astro for Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript.

Official docs: Webflow Developer Docs · Astro Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureWebflowAstro
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost Value
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Scalability
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ecosystem
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Webflow

Pros

  • Generates clean, semantic HTML/CSS — no code bloat
  • Full CSS control with a visual interface (like coding without typing)
  • Built-in CMS with API access and structured content
  • Good performance with global CDN hosting included

Cons

  • Steep learning curve for non-designers (CSS concepts required)
  • CMS is limited to 10,000 items on the highest plan
  • No server-side logic — relies on third-party integrations
  • Per-site pricing adds up for agencies managing multiple clients

Astro

Pros

  • Ships zero JS to the client by default (Islands Architecture)
  • Use React, Vue, Svelte, or any framework in the same project
  • Content collections with type-safe Markdown/MDX
  • Purpose-built for content sites — blogs, docs, marketing pages

Cons

  • Not ideal for highly interactive apps (designed for content sites)
  • Smaller ecosystem than Next.js — fewer integrations available
  • SSR support is newer and less battle-tested
  • Island architecture requires thinking differently about interactivity

Platform Details

DetailWebflowAstro
Language / Stack
Visual (generates HTML/CSS/JS)JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic)
Type
website builderframework
Pricing
Free / $14-39/monthFree (open-source)
Open Source
NoYes
Best For
Designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing codeContent-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript
Export Method
CMS API or HTML export (static code)N/A (destination framework)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Webflow if…

  • You need designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code
  • Your team is comfortable with Visual (generates HTML/CSS/JS)

Choose Astro if…

  • You need content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal javascript
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want a low learning curve for non-technical team members
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Webflow and Astro depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Webflow is a website builder built with Visual (generates HTML/CSS/JS), while Astro is a framework built with JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. If your team includes non-developers who need to publish content frequently, Webflow's familiar editing interface may save you onboarding time.

From a cost perspective, Astro is open-source (Free (open-source)), while Webflow (Free / $14-39/month) carries ongoing license costs. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP supports migration between 60+ platforms, so you're never locked in regardless of which you pick today.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Webflow better than Astro?
Astro scores higher overall (25/30 vs 19/30) thanks to better performance. However, Webflow remains the better choice for Designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code.
Can I migrate from Webflow to Astro?
Yes. Export your Webflow content via CMS API or HTML export (static code), then convert it to Markdown or import into a headless CMS. LeaveWP can help automate this process while preserving your SEO metadata and URL structure.
What are the main differences between Webflow and Astro?
Webflow is visual web development platform with clean code output, while Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. Key differences: ease of use (Webflow: 3/5, Astro: 4/5), pricing (Free / $14-39/month vs Free (open-source)), and scalability (Webflow: 3/5, Astro: 4/5).
How much does Webflow cost compared to Astro?
Webflow: Free / $14-39/month. Astro: Free (open-source). Astro is open-source and free to self-host, while Webflow is a paid platform.
Which is easier to learn, Webflow or Astro?
Astro is easier to pick up (4/5 vs 3/5). Ships zero JS to the client by default (Islands Architecture). Webflow Steep learning curve for non-designers (CSS concepts required).
Which performs better, Webflow or Astro?
Astro has the performance edge (5/5 vs 4/5). As a framework, Astro pre-renders pages for near-instant load times. Webflow may require additional optimization for high-traffic sites.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Webflow or Astro

Webflow vs Astro Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Webflow, Astro, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration