📦

Webflow

VS

Next.js

Webflow vs Next.js

Webflow vs Next.js: which is right for your project? Webflow is visual web development platform with clean code output. Next.js is react framework for production with ssr, ssg, and api routes. We compare features, performance, and pricing.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

Next.js wins overall, but Webflow is better for designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code. Choose Webflow for Designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code. Choose Next.js for Production web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies.

Official docs: Webflow Developer Docs · Next.js Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureWebflowNext.js
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost Value
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Scalability
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ecosystem
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Webflow

Pros

  • Generates clean, semantic HTML/CSS — no code bloat
  • Full CSS control with a visual interface (like coding without typing)
  • Built-in CMS with API access and structured content
  • Good performance with global CDN hosting included

Cons

  • Steep learning curve for non-designers (CSS concepts required)
  • CMS is limited to 10,000 items on the highest plan
  • No server-side logic — relies on third-party integrations
  • Per-site pricing adds up for agencies managing multiple clients

Next.js

Pros

  • Hybrid rendering — SSG, SSR, ISR, and client-side in one app
  • Most popular React framework with massive community
  • Built-in image optimization, API routes, and middleware
  • Optimized for Vercel but deploys anywhere (Node.js, Docker)

Cons

  • React learning curve for non-JavaScript developers
  • App Router introduced complexity with Server Components
  • Build output tightly coupled to Vercel's infrastructure features
  • Can be overkill for simple static content sites

Platform Details

DetailWebflowNext.js
Language / Stack
Visual (generates HTML/CSS/JS)JavaScript/TypeScript (React)
Type
website builderframework
Pricing
Free / $14-39/monthFree (open-source)
Open Source
NoYes
Best For
Designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing codeProduction web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies
Export Method
CMS API or HTML export (static code)N/A (destination framework)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Webflow if…

  • You need designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code
  • Your team is comfortable with Visual (generates HTML/CSS/JS)

Choose Next.js if…

  • You need production web apps and content sites needing flexible rendering strategies
  • Your team is comfortable with JavaScript/TypeScript (React)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Webflow and Next.js depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Webflow is a website builder built with Visual (generates HTML/CSS/JS), while Next.js is a framework built with JavaScript/TypeScript (React). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. If your team includes non-developers who need to publish content frequently, Webflow's familiar editing interface may save you onboarding time.

From a cost perspective, Next.js is open-source (Free (open-source)), while Webflow (Free / $14-39/month) carries ongoing license costs. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP offers a free WebflowNext.js migration tool that preserves your URLs, metadata, and content structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Webflow better than Next.js?
Next.js scores higher overall (28/30 vs 19/30) thanks to better performance. However, Webflow remains the better choice for Designers who want pixel-perfect control without writing code.
Can I migrate from Webflow to Next.js?
Yes. Export your Webflow content via CMS API or HTML export (static code), then convert it to Markdown or import into a headless CMS. LeaveWP can help automate this process while preserving your SEO metadata and URL structure.
What are the main differences between Webflow and Next.js?
Webflow is visual web development platform with clean code output, while Next.js is react framework for production with ssr, ssg, and api routes. Key differences: performance (Webflow: 4/5, Next.js: 5/5), pricing (Free / $14-39/month vs Free (open-source)), and ecosystem size (Webflow: 3/5, Next.js: 5/5).
How much does Webflow cost compared to Next.js?
Webflow: Free / $14-39/month. Next.js: Free (open-source). Next.js is open-source and free to self-host, while Webflow is a paid platform.
Which is easier to learn, Webflow or Next.js?
They're similarly approachable (both 3/5). Webflow uses Visual (generates HTML/CSS/JS), while Next.js uses JavaScript/TypeScript (React). Your team's existing skills will determine which feels easier.
Which performs better, Webflow or Next.js?
Next.js has the performance edge (5/5 vs 4/5). As a framework, Next.js pre-renders pages for near-instant load times. Webflow may require additional optimization for high-traffic sites.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Webflow or Next.js

Webflow vs Next.js Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Webflow, Next.js, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration