performance5M+ users

LiteSpeed Cache Alternative for Next.js & Astro

Move beyond server-side caching to pre-built static files served globally.

TL;DR

You don't need LiteSpeed Cache after migrating to Next.js or Astro. Modern frameworks offer built-in solutions or lightweight npm packages that replace LiteSpeed Cache with better performance and zero plugin bloat. See the alternatives below.

Official docs: Next.js Documentation · Astro Documentation

The Problem with LiteSpeed Cache

LiteSpeed Cache alternatives for static sites

Modern Alternatives

Static Generation

Pre-build pages at deploy time

service

Pros

  • Easy to use
  • Modern solution
  • Better performance

Cons

  • May require learning

How to Implement

Visit https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching/get-static-props

Netlify/Vercel

Automatic edge caching

service

Pros

  • Easy to use
  • Modern solution
  • Better performance

Cons

  • May require learning

How to Implement

Visit https://netlify.com

Migration Steps

1

Export WordPress content

2

Build static site

3

Deploy to edge platform

4

Enjoy instant global performance

Frequently Asked Questions

Is static hosting as fast as LiteSpeed?
Faster. Pre-built HTML served from edge is faster than any cache system.

Guides for Replacing LiteSpeed Cache

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Leave WordPress Behind?

Migrate your entire WordPress site to Next.js - including replacing LiteSpeed Cache functionality.

Start Free Migration

Browse all migration guides →