How to Choose a Headless CMS in 2026: Decision Guide
Asad Ali
Founder & Lead Developer · Former WordPress Core Contributor
How to Choose a Headless CMS in 2026: Decision Guide
So you've decided to go headless. Now comes the hard part: choosing which headless CMS to use.
This guide helps you navigate the options and pick the right one for your needs.
Quick Overview
| CMS | Type | Best For | Pricing |
| Sanity | Cloud | Flexibility, real-time | Free tier → Pay as you go |
| Contentful | Cloud | Enterprise, teams | Free tier → $300/mo+ |
| Strapi | Self-hosted | Full control, open-source | Free (self-host) |
| Payload | Self-hosted | TypeScript, modern | Free (self-host) |
| Hygraph | Cloud | GraphQL-first | Free tier → $299/mo+ |
| Decap CMS | Git-based | Simple sites | Free |
| Prismic | Cloud | Visual editing | Free tier → $100/mo+ |
| Directus | Self-hosted | Database first | Free (self-host) |
Decision Framework
Answer these questions to narrow your options:
1. Hosted or Self-Hosted?
Cloud/Hosted CMS:
- ✅ No server management
- ✅ Automatic updates
- ✅ Built-in scaling
- ❌ Monthly costs at scale
- ❌ Vendor lock-in potential
Self-Hosted CMS:
- ✅ Full control
- ✅ No per-user pricing
- ✅ Own your data completely
- ❌ Server management needed
- ❌ You handle scaling/updates
2. Technical Expertise?
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
| No developers | Contentful, Prismic |
| Some technical skill | Sanity, Hygraph |
| Full dev team | Strapi, Payload |
| Minimal needs | Decap CMS |
3. Budget?
| Budget | Options |
| $0/month | Sanity (free tier), Strapi, Payload, Decap |
| < $100/month | Sanity, Prismic, Hygraph |
| $100-500/month | Contentful, Hygraph, Prismic |
| Enterprise | Contentful, Sanity |
4. Content Complexity?
| Content Type | Best Options |
| Simple blog | Decap CMS, Sanity |
| Marketing site | Sanity, Prismic |
| Multi-language | Sanity, Contentful |
| Complex schemas | Sanity, Payload |
| E-commerce | Sanity, Payload |
Top Headless CMS Options Compared
Sanity
The flexible, developer-friendly choice
Sanity provides a customizable studio (content editing interface) that you can tailor to your exact needs.
Strengths
- Customizable Studio: Build exactly the editing experience you need
- GROQ query language: Powerful, flexible queries
- Real-time collaboration: Multiple editors, no conflicts
- Portable Text: Rich text as structured data
- Generous free tier: 100K API requests/month
Weaknesses
- Learning curve: GROQ and studio customization take time
- Studio requires code: Not for non-developers to customize
- Can get expensive: Heavy API usage adds up
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Includes |
| Free | $0/mo | 3 users, 100K API requests |
| Team | $15/user/mo | Unlimited requests, roles |
| Business | $99/mo base | SSO, support |
Best For
Teams who want complete flexibility and have developers to customize the experience.
Example Use Cases
- Marketing sites with custom content types
- E-commerce with complex product data
- Documentation sites
- Multi-brand content hubs
Contentful
The enterprise-grade standard
Contentful pioneered headless CMS and remains the enterprise choice with robust features and reliability.
Strengths
- Mature platform: 10+ years, battle-tested
- Enterprise features: SSO, roles, workflows, compliance
- Excellent SDKs: Well-documented, many languages
- Visual modeler: Non-developers can create content types
- App marketplace: Extend functionality
Weaknesses
- Expensive: Pricing jumps significantly after free tier
- Content modeling limits: Less flexible than Sanity
- Complex for simple sites: Overkill for blogs
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Includes |
| Free | $0/mo | 5 users, 1M API calls |
| Team | $300/mo | 10 users, more calls |
| Enterprise | Custom | Everything |
Note: Pricing is a common complaint. Expect $500+/month for real usage.
Best For
Enterprise teams needing compliance, workflows, and bulletproof reliability.
Example Use Cases
- Enterprise marketing sites
- Multi-region content operations
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance)
- Sites with many non-technical editors
Strapi
The open-source self-hosted option
Strapi is free, open-source, and you host it yourself. Full control, no monthly fees.
Strengths
- Open-source: No vendor lock-in
- Self-hosted: Own your data, no per-user fees
- Plugin ecosystem: Extend with community plugins
- REST and GraphQL: Both available
- Good admin UI: Clean, usable interface
Weaknesses
- Self-hosting complexity: You manage servers, scaling, updates
- Plugin quality varies: Some community plugins are rough
- Breaking changes: Major versions can require work
- No real-time by default: Requires additional setup
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Notes |
| Self-hosted | Free | You pay hosting costs |
| Strapi Cloud | $99/mo+ | Managed hosting |
Best For
Teams who want full control, have DevOps resources, and want to avoid SaaS fees.
Example Use Cases
- Startups wanting to minimize costs
- Projects requiring data residency
- Internal tools
- Multi-tenant applications
Payload CMS
Modern, TypeScript-first CMS
Payload is newer but rapidly gaining popularity for its developer experience and flexibility.
Strengths
- TypeScript-native: Excellent type safety
- Code-first: Content types defined in code
- Self-hosted: No per-user pricing
- Block-based pages: Visual page building
- Auth built-in: User authentication included
- Excellent docs: Very well documented
Weaknesses
- Newer platform: Smaller community than Strapi
- Self-hosting required: Need DevOps knowledge
- TypeScript required: Not for non-TS teams
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Notes |
| Self-hosted | Free | You pay hosting |
| Payload Cloud | Coming | Managed option |
Best For
TypeScript developers who want a modern, flexible CMS they fully control.
Example Use Cases
- SaaS products needing CMS
- Custom applications
- E-commerce platforms
- Developer portfolios
Hygraph (formerly GraphCMS)
GraphQL-first content platform
If you love GraphQL, Hygraph builds everything around it.
Strengths
- GraphQL-native: Purpose-built for GraphQL
- Content Federation: Combine multiple sources
- Visual schema editor: Easy content modeling
- Localization: Built-in multi-language
- Good free tier: Generous for small projects
Weaknesses
- GraphQL only: No REST API
- Pricing escalates: Gets expensive at scale
- Smaller ecosystem: Fewer tutorials/resources
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Includes |
| Free | $0/mo | 3 users, 1M API calls |
| Professional | $299/mo | 25 users, 5M API calls |
| Enterprise | Custom | Everything |
Best For
Teams already using GraphQL who want deep integration.
Decap CMS (formerly Netlify CMS)
Git-based simplicity
Decap stores content in your Git repository. No database, no external service.
Strengths
- Free: Completely free, forever
- Git-native: Content is in your repo
- Simple: Minimal setup
- Version control: Full history via Git
- No hosting needed: Runs alongside your site
Weaknesses
- Basic features: No workflow, limited roles
- Not for scale: Struggles with large content volumes
- Text-based: Less visual than alternatives
- Limited asset management: Basic file handling
Pricing
Free, always.
Best For
Simple sites, blogs, documentation where content lives in Git.
Example Use Cases
- Developer blogs
- Documentation sites
- Open-source project sites
- JAMstack marketing pages
Prismic
Visual editing focused
Prismic emphasizes the editing experience with visual slice-based editing.
Strengths
- Slice Machine: Reusable content components
- Visual editing: Easy for marketers
- Good DX: Nice developer experience
- Preview: Built-in preview support
- Reasonable pricing: More affordable than Contentful
Weaknesses
- Slice-centric: Can feel limiting
- Less flexible: Not as customizable as Sanity
- Smaller community: Fewer resources
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Includes |
| Free | $0/mo | 1 user, 100 docs |
| Small | $7/mo | 3 users, 1500 docs |
| Medium | $100/mo | 7 users, 10K docs |
Best For
Marketing teams wanting visual editing with developer support.
Directus
Database-first approach
Directus wraps any SQL database with an admin interface and API.
Strengths
- Any SQL database: Works with existing DBs
- Open-source: Self-host free
- Data ownership: Your database, your control
- Flexible: Not opinionated about structure
- Built-in auth: User management included
Weaknesses
- Database complexity: Need to understand DBs
- Self-hosting burden: You manage it
- Less content-focused: More like a data platform
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Notes |
| Self-hosted | Free | Open-source |
| Directus Cloud | $99/mo+ | Managed |
Best For
Teams with existing databases or needing a flexible data platform.
Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Sanity | Contentful | Strapi | Payload | Hygraph | Decap |
| Self-hosted | Cloud | Cloud | ✅ | ✅ | Cloud | ✅ (Git) |
| Free tier | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Real-time | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Visual editing | Custom | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Basic |
| GraphQL | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| REST API | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| TypeScript | Good | Good | Okay | ✅ | Good | ❌ |
| Multi-lang | ✅ | ✅ | Plugin | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Migration from WordPress
All headless CMS options require:
1. Export WordPress content → Use our free tool
2. Set up headless CMS → Create content types
3. Import content → Migrate data
4. Build frontend → Next.js, Astro, etc.
The CMS you choose doesn't change the migration process—just where content ends up.
My Recommendations
For Most Teams
Sanity offers the best balance of flexibility, pricing, and developer experience.
For Enterprises
Contentful is the safe choice when compliance, support, and reliability matter most.
For Full Control
Payload (TypeScript) or Strapi (JavaScript) for self-hosted ownership.
For Simple Sites
Decap CMS for blogs and docs where Git-based is sufficient.
For GraphQL Lovers
Hygraph if your stack is GraphQL-centric.
FAQ
Q: Can I migrate between headless CMS platforms?
Yes, though it takes work. Content exports/imports are possible. The frontend remains unchanged.
Q: Do I need developers for headless CMS?
For setup, yes. For ongoing content editing, no—the editing interfaces are user-friendly.
Q: Which has the best editing experience?
Contentful and Prismic are excellent out-of-box. Sanity is best if you customize it.
Q: What about WordPress as headless?
It works but is heavier than purpose-built headless CMS. See our headless WordPress guide.
Q: How do I deploy a headless setup?
Use platforms like Vercel or Netlify for the frontend. Compare hosting platforms →
Conclusion
Choose your headless CMS based on:
1. Hosted vs self-hosted preference
2. Budget constraints
3. Team technical ability
4. Content complexity needs
Most teams do well with Sanity (flexibility + good pricing) or Strapi/Payload (full control, self-hosted).
Related guides:
Related Articles
View allHeadless CMS vs Traditional CMS: When to Use Which
Understand the differences between headless and traditional CMS. Learn which approach fits your project based on real requirements.
Headless WordPress in 2026: Is It Worth the Complexity?
Headless WordPress promises the best of both worlds - WordPress's familiar editor with modern frontend performance. But is the complexity worth it? We analyze the real costs.
WordPress REST API: A Complete Guide for Developers
Master the WordPress REST API. Understand endpoints, authentication, custom routes, and how this enables headless WordPress.
Jamstack Explained: A WordPress User's Guide
What is Jamstack and why are people leaving WordPress for it? This guide explains Jamstack concepts in WordPress terms.