Astro
Hugo
Astro vs Hugo: which is right for your project? Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. Hugo is fastest static site generator, written in go. We compare features, performance, and pricing.
Start MigrationIt depends — Astro and Hugo serve different use cases well. Choose Astro for Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript. Choose Hugo for Documentation sites and blogs where build speed and simplicity matter most.
Official docs: Astro Documentation · Hugo Documentation
| Feature | Astro | Hugo |
|---|---|---|
Ease of Use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Flexibility | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Cost Value | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Ecosystem | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Detail | Astro | Hugo |
|---|---|---|
Language / Stack | JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic) | Go (Go templates) |
Type | framework | ssg |
Pricing | Free (open-source) | Free (open-source) |
Open Source | Yes | Yes |
Best For | Content-heavy websites that need maximum performance with minimal JavaScript | Documentation sites and blogs where build speed and simplicity matter most |
Export Method | N/A (destination framework) | N/A (destination framework) |
The right choice between Astro and Hugo depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.
These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Astro is a framework built with JavaScript/TypeScript (framework-agnostic), while Hugo is a ssg built with Go (Go templates). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. Both platforms require some technical comfort — consider which tech stack aligns better with your team's existing skills.
From a cost perspective, both platforms are open-source, so the real cost difference is hosting and operational overhead. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.
Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP supports migration between 60+ platforms, so you're never locked in regardless of which you pick today.
Explore more comparisons featuring Astro or Hugo
Compare WordPress and Astro for blogging. Find out which platform gives you better performance and SEO.
Compare Astro and Gatsby for building static websites. See which SSG is better for your project.
Compare Hugo and 11ty for building static websites. Find the best SSG for your project.
WordPress vs Hugo: which is right for your project? WordPress is php-based cms powering 43% of the web. Hugo is fastest static site generator, written in go. We compare features, performance, and pricing.
Drupal vs Astro: which is right for your project? Drupal is enterprise php cms for complex content architectures. Astro is content-focused framework that ships zero javascript by default. We compare features, performance, and pricing.
Drupal vs Hugo: which is right for your project? Drupal is enterprise php cms for complex content architectures. Hugo is fastest static site generator, written in go. We compare features, performance, and pricing.
In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration
Static site generators have evolved dramatically. Here's how they compare to WordPress in 2026 and why many sites are making the switch.
16 min readcomparisonBoth Gatsby and Next.js can power your WordPress migration. But they take fundamentally different approaches. Here's how to choose the right one for your project.
12 min readcomparisonCompare Astro and Next.js for your next project. Performance, features, and use cases explained to help you decide.
11 min readMove your content between Astro, Hugo, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.
Start Free Migration