📦

Ghost

VS
📦

Hugo

Ghost vs Hugo

Ghost vs Hugo: which is right for your project? Ghost is modern publishing platform built for professional content creators. Hugo is fastest static site generator, written in go. We compare features, performance, and pricing.

Start Migration

TL;DR — Our Recommendation

Hugo wins overall, but Ghost is better for professional writers, journalists, and newsletter creators who want to monetize content. Choose Ghost for Professional writers, journalists, and newsletter creators who want to monetize content. Choose Hugo for Documentation sites and blogs where build speed and simplicity matter most.

Official docs: Ghost Documentation · Hugo Documentation

Feature by Feature Comparison

FeatureGhostHugo
Ease of Use
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Flexibility
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost Value
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Scalability
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ecosystem
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pros & Cons

Ghost

Pros

  • Beautiful, focused writing experience (Markdown + rich editor)
  • Built-in membership and subscription payment system
  • Newsletter/email delivery built right into the platform
  • Fast Node.js architecture — much faster than WordPress

Cons

  • Limited to blogs and newsletters — not a general CMS
  • Small theme ecosystem compared to WordPress
  • Self-hosting requires Node.js server expertise
  • Managed hosting (Ghost Pro) is relatively expensive

Hugo

Pros

  • Blazing fast builds — renders 10,000 pages in seconds
  • Single binary with zero dependencies
  • Built-in image processing, taxonomies, and i18n
  • Huge theme library for quick starts

Cons

  • Go template syntax has a steep learning curve
  • No JavaScript framework — limits client-side interactivity
  • Plugin system is limited compared to Gatsby or Astro
  • Harder to add dynamic features without additional tooling

Platform Details

DetailGhostHugo
Language / Stack
Node.jsGo (Go templates)
Type
bloggingssg
Pricing
Free (self-hosted) / $9-199/month (managed)Free (open-source)
Open Source
YesYes
Best For
Professional writers, journalists, and newsletter creators who want to monetize contentDocumentation sites and blogs where build speed and simplicity matter most
Export Method
Built-in JSON export or Content APIN/A (destination framework)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Ghost if…

  • You need professional writers, journalists, and newsletter creators who want to monetize content
  • Your team is comfortable with Node.js
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • You want a low learning curve for non-technical team members

Choose Hugo if…

  • You need documentation sites and blogs where build speed and simplicity matter most
  • Your team is comfortable with Go (Go templates)
  • You want an open-source solution with full code ownership
  • Budget is a top priority — free (open-source)
  • You want maximum performance with static or server-rendered pages

Which Should You Pick?

The right choice between Ghost and Hugo depends on three things: your team's technical skills, your project timeline, and your long-term content strategy.

These platforms take fundamentally different approaches. Ghost is a blogging built with Node.js, while Hugo is a ssg built with Go (Go templates). That architectural difference shapes everything from daily content editing workflows to deployment and hosting costs. Both platforms require some technical comfort — consider which tech stack aligns better with your team's existing skills.

From a cost perspective, both platforms are open-source, so the real cost difference is hosting and operational overhead. Factor in plugin or extension costs, developer rates for each tech stack, and whether you need managed hosting or can self-host.

Whichever you choose, migrating between them is straightforward. LeaveWP offers a free GhostHugo migration tool that preserves your URLs, metadata, and content structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ghost better than Hugo?
Hugo scores higher overall (24/30 vs 19/30) thanks to better performance. However, Ghost remains the better choice for Professional writers, journalists, and newsletter creators who want to monetize content.
Can I migrate from Ghost to Hugo?
Yes. Export your Ghost content via Built-in JSON export or Content API, then convert it to Markdown or import into a headless CMS. LeaveWP can help automate this process while preserving your SEO metadata and URL structure.
What are the main differences between Ghost and Hugo?
Ghost is modern publishing platform built for professional content creators, while Hugo is fastest static site generator, written in go. Key differences: ease of use (Ghost: 4/5, Hugo: 3/5), pricing (Free (self-hosted) / $9-199/month (managed) vs Free (open-source)), and ecosystem size (Ghost: 2/5, Hugo: 3/5).
How much does Ghost cost compared to Hugo?
Ghost: Free (self-hosted) / $9-199/month (managed). Hugo: Free (open-source). Both are open-source, so the main cost difference is hosting and infrastructure.
Which is easier to learn, Ghost or Hugo?
Ghost is easier to pick up (4/5 vs 3/5). Beautiful, focused writing experience (Markdown + rich editor). Hugo Go template syntax has a steep learning curve.
Which performs better, Ghost or Hugo?
Hugo has the performance edge (5/5 vs 4/5). As a static site generator, Hugo pre-renders pages for near-instant load times. Ghost may require additional optimization for high-traffic sites.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons featuring Ghost or Hugo

Ghost vs Hugo Guides

In-depth guides and tutorials to help with your migration

Ready to Migrate?

Move your content between Ghost, Hugo, and 60+ other platforms with our free migration tool.

Start Free Migration